.png&w=2048&q=75)
Millions of customers rely on our domains and web hosting to get their ideas online. We know what we do and like to share them with you.
The digital world has been transformed quite thoroughly with artificial intelligence becoming a key component in how we create written materials. As content made by AI tools fills up websites all over the internet, search engines keep tweaking their evaluation techniques to make sure users get valuable, reliable info. Google's E-E-A-T framework—Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness—is basically the highest benchmark for assessing content quality, which in a way creates both obstacles and possibilities for AI-generated content.
AI-generated content faces some built-in problems when trying to meet the E-E-A-T standards that search engines value so much:
The biggest challenge for AI-generated content is arguably showing authentic experience. Unlike people who write from their own encounters, professional background, or actual situations they've been through, AI has absolutely no real-world experience to draw from. This shortcoming becomes especially obvious when creating stuff about topics where firsthand knowledge really matters—like medical treatments, professional advice, or technical processes that require specialized know-how. This gap in lived experience in AI-generated content can, at the end of the day, weaken its ability to offer the kind of nuanced insights that search engines increasingly look for.
While today's AI can sort of process and combine massive amounts of information, this skill is fundamentally different from human expertise. Genuine expertise involves deep understanding, critical thinking, and applying knowledge in context. Content created by AI might present facts correctly but often lacks the judgment that characterizes human expertise. Search engines are getting more sophisticated at telling the difference between content that just presents information and content that shows real understanding.
Establishing authority requires building a reputation in a specific field—something AI systems can't achieve on their own. Authority grows through recognition from others in the field, being cited by respected sources, and consistently sharing valuable insights. Without proper connection to recognized human experts or organizations, AI-generated content struggles to develop the authority signals that search engines use to judge content quality.
For people to consider content trustworthy, it must be accurate, transparent, and able to handle information responsibly. AI-generated content faces questions about factual reliability, especially in Your Money or Your Life (YMYL) topics, where wrong information could potentially harm users. Search engines apply particularly strict evaluation criteria to content that might affect users' health, finances, or safety, areas where AI-generated content often receives extra scrutiny.
Despite these challenges, organizations can use several tactics to improve the E-E-A-T signals in their AI-generated content:
The most effective approach treats AI as a helpful tool rather than a standalone content creator. Successful implementation includes:
This combined approach uses AI's efficiency while keeping the authenticity and expertise that search engines reward.
Content creators should provide obvious signals of the human expertise behind AI-generated content:
These elements help search engines connect AI-generated content with legitimate human expertise.
Organizations can strengthen the authority of their AI-generated content by:
These practices help establish domain authority that extends to AI-generated content.
To ensure AI-generated content is trustworthy:
These measures show search engines that an organization takes responsibility for its AI-generated content.
When used correctly, AI can improve content creation while still meeting E-E-A-T requirements:
Google's view on AI-generated content keeps changing, with several key principles becoming clear:
Google doesn't flat-out ban AI-generated content but evaluates all content using the same quality standards. The focus remains on the value provided to users rather than how the content was made. This approach was clearly shown in the March 2024 Core Update, which negatively affected many websites that relied heavily on low-quality AI-generated content without human oversight and E-E-A-T elements.
The update reinforced that AI-generated content needs to show the same qualities as high-performing human-created content: accuracy, depth, usefulness, and alignment with E-E-A-T principles. Just using AI to mass-produce content without quality checks now carries significant ranking risks.
The most successful approach to AI-generated content treats AI as a powerful collaboration tool rather than a replacement for human expertise. Organizations that combine AI's computational capabilities with human insight, experience, and judgment create content that satisfies both user needs and search engine quality standards.
This balanced approach involves:
AI-generated content can definitely achieve credibility in search engine assessment when properly implemented within a framework that prioritizes E-E-A-T principles. The key isn't whether content uses AI, but how AI is used as part of a complete content strategy that maintains quality, accuracy, and user value.
As search algorithms get more sophisticated, they'll likely get better at distinguishing between AI-generated content that just mimics expertise and content that genuinely demonstrates E-E-A-T qualities. Organizations that see AI as a tool to amplify human expertise—rather than replace it—will be in the best position to create content that performs well in search rankings while truly serving user needs.
The future of successful AI-generated content lies in thoughtful implementation, human collaboration, and commitment to the principles that have always defined valuable content: providing genuine expertise, demonstrating real experience, establishing legitimate authority, and maintaining consistent trustworthiness.
